USA Basketball regret not choosing Caitlin Clark after The USA women’s olympic team had the lowest attendances of any women’s basketball team in the opening game of the 2024 Paris olympics, and USC head coach who helped pick the team, basically admitted that caitlin clark was unfairly snubbed and if they were to pick the team today, she would be there.

Caitlyn Clark’s exclusion from the Team USA roster for the upcoming Olympics has sparked significant controversy, particularly as women’s Olympic basketball attendance continues to dwindle. Clark’s impressive performance in the WNBA has intensified the debate, leading many to question the decision-making process and its potential impact on Team USA’s success.

Clark, a standout player in the WNBA, has been showcasing her exceptional skills by leading the league in assists and achieving multiple triple-doubles.

Her notable performance includes a triple-double with 19 points, 13 assists, and 12 rebounds-a feat crucial in victories over top teams like the Liberty. Despite these achievements, she was not selected for the national team, a decision that has raised eyebrows among fans and analysts alike.

The timing of the USA roster announcement has also been a point of contention. The roster was revealed earlier than those of other countries, potentially limiting the evaluation of players’ current form during the WNBA season. This premature αππουncement has fueled concerns about the fairness of the selection process.

Head coach Don Staley has publicly acknowledged the possibility of a mistake in not including Clark, reflecting a shift in perspective that could influence future team selections. Despite Staley’s support, the decision ultimately rests with head coach Cheryl Reeve, whose blunt responses to media inquiries have further fueled the controversy. Reeve’s comments have been criticized for their lack of detail, suggesting a possible disconnect between team management and public expectations.

The exclusion of Clark highlights broader issues within the women’s basketball selection process. Her undeniable talent and impact on the game have sparked discussions about the fairness and visibility of women’s sports. Clark’s presence оп the team could have potentially boosted international interest and attendance at women’s basketball events, underscoring the missed opportunity to promote the sport on a global scale.

Historical precedents for selecting college players for Team USA, such as Diana Taurasi and Candice Parker, further complicate the situation. The inconsistency in selection criteria, combined with suggestions of jealousy from current players, adds layers of complexity to the debate. Critics argue that internal conflicts and biases may have influenced the decision, showcasing a preference for college players over established WNBA stars.

Despite these issues, Team USA remains a dominant force in women’s Olympic basketball. The strength of American players allows for controversial selection choices, which may not face immediate backlash but still generate considerable discussion. The impact of Clark’s exclusion could also affect Team USA’s morale, potentially influencing their performance and adding pressure to secure the gold medal.

Looking ahead, Clark’s absence might provide her with an opportunity to further develop her skills, potentially positioning her as one of the best point guards in the WNBA. However, if Team USA fails to win gold, the decision to omit Clark will likely face increased scrutiny, with many questioning the team selection process and its impact on the sport.

In summary, Caitlyn Clark’s omission from Team USA has ignited a significant debate about player selection, fairness, and the promotion of women’s basketball. As the Olympic games approach, the ramifications of this decision will likely continue to be a focal point for fans, analysts, and the broader basketball community.